An
interesting point made by Themba 'Pro' Mnini in his email refers to the fact
that those who display their football knowledge as 'experts' on TV, radio and
print media, are silent when it comes to topics that would really educate
coaches and supporters.
Briefly,
his view about the panels of experts: 'They are the masters of confusing
talking - 'final-third', 'transition', 'pressing-high', 'decision-making',
'tactical-foul', 'playing between the lines' and so on but they say nothing
about our game philosophy, style of play, the role of skilful and creative
players, rigid coaching and the negative of long-ball predictable mentality,
the need to introduce much younger players in the Premier Soccer League (PSL),
etc.
These
are the aspects that can be more relevant to improving our football and also
educate coaches. Are the 'experts' hired only to promote mediocrity? Of all of
them I find Zane Moosa and Isaac ‘Shakes’ Kungwane to be more honest and yet
these two don't claim they have 'superior knowledge'. I could be that the rest
have nothing to say because they know too little or nothing.
I
challenge them to start giving us interesting information and pure football
knowledge, just to prove me wrong'.
What's
your opinion?